I will stick up for my teammate and say that this point is arguable I might well have made the same call and it's far from obvious that it was the wrong call at the time. If you think something needs changing, I'm happy to hear it, but please make it obvious how you're not asking for a perfect system, because I'm afraid that's not an option. This is what imperfect systems do, so it's not clear to me what needs changing. And we don't know how to make those things not happen at the same time sometimes. We don't know how to make software that doesn't do false positives and we don't know how to make humans that don't do errors. If I put myself in suspicious shoes, I can come up with objections to the above, but I can also answer them pretty simply: this entire thing was a combo of two data points, one borderline human error and one software false positive. If you're a wiggly graph, sometimes the graph goes above a line. Most days it generates the HN you're used to and some days (quite a few days actually) it generates the next outlier, but that's how stochastics work, yes? If you're a boat on a choppy sea, sometimes some waves slosh into the boat. This was just the usual stochastic churn that generates HN. In other words, nothing was co-ordinated and the dots weren't connected. After that, the current post got upvoted to the front page, where it remains. Software marked a dupe for the rather esoteric reasons explained here. No moderator saw any of the other posts until I woke up, turned on HN, and-surprise!-saw the latest $outrage. When you see on a submission, you should assume users flagged it because with rare exceptions, that's always why.Ī moderator saw that, but didn't look very closely and thought "yeah that's probably garden-variety controversy/drama" and left the flags on. Here's one tip for you guys, from years-long, world-weary experience: if you're coming up with sensational explanations in breathless excitement, it's almost certainly untrue.Įdit: ok, here's what happened. This post is on the front page right now (edit: and now also ) - that's the opposite of "disappearing".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |